This is probably my favorite of Kant's three critiques (Pure and Practical Reason being the other two). However, when it comes to reading Kant, saying "favorite" is not quite right: he was such a bad writer, and such a brilliant thinker, its hard to deal with some times.
In any case, this is very i

Nu ik de derde kritiek gelezen heb, stop ik met filosofie lezen.

This book is the make it or break it for Kant. It will either tie everything together in a regulative bliss, or, as is evidenced by history, set the demand that reason progresses and solves its dualisms for Hegel. He almost did it.

The possibility of systematization of the philosophy of history is of

the book I most respect and least enjoyed reading

It would be difficult to overstate Kant's importance, or the greatness of his three critiques, which must be understood as three parts of one unified project, and, I should add, must be read in sequence. European thought still operates within the horizons that Kant demarcated, and as a matter of int

I've previously reviewed both The Critique of Pure Reason and The Critique of Practical Reason, describing some of the reasons why the reading of the three critiques led to what might be called a conversion experience--or perhaps an intellectual mystical or jnana experience.

For one who has sedulousl

Whist I have to admit I had to read this for study, I'm phenomenally glad that I did. It's horribly impenetrable, though. Very, very hard work to get through, let alone digest. Do I understand Kant? No, not really. Can I talk about him and his ideas comfortably? Well, yes, kind of. Would I recommend

اولاش اذیت کرد. مثل دو تا نقد دیگه‌ی کانت. ولی باهاش که راه بیای، اصطلاحاش که دستت بیاد، عاشق اینم میشی. مثل اون دو تا نقد دیگه‌ی کانت.
البته اینجا کانت خیلی لطیف‌تر از کانتیه که توی نقد عقل محض می‌بینیم. ناسلامتی داره از زیبایی‌شناسی حرف می‌زنی.
از بهترین‌ کتاب‌درسی‌هایی بود که خوندم و فقط خدا می‌دون