I tried to post my review here, but it's too long for Goodreads. If you're interested, you can read it here: Fragments on Hegel's Science of Logic.

Quick preview:

One has to marvel at the breathtaking ambition and stupendous folly of the Science of Logic; that Hegel, armed only with his idiosyncrati

At the beginning of his Three Studies on Hegel, Adorno chastises Croce for asking the question, What is still alive in Hegel's philosophy and what is dead? Adorno sees this question as arrogant, since it implies that the critic is in a position far above Hegel, a vantage point from which the great G

Mein Gott in Himmel, I could sit you too few intrepid reviewers around a dinner table. Weltschmerz = vindicated. Cuz surely wherever the most unflagging exertion in the search for truth is will also be the clamor of crowds.

In striving to re-view the Logic, true to form, I would have to re-view not

Það er hálfpartinn gagnslaust að skrá bók sem þessa sem "lesna" — ég er búinn að skrifa bachelorsritgerð OG meistararitgerð um hana og mér finnst ég samt ekki vera búinn að rétt krafsa nema í yfirborð hennar. Þrátt fyrir það varði ég hartnær öllu árinu í að lesa hana og mér finnst því viðeigandi að

This is a book about the knowing of knowing, the logic of logic, and the thinking of thinking itself. Within you will not find any arguments in the traditional form of propositions leading to a conclusion, there are no justifications in this work. Instead you will find yourself in a journey of expla

This is my second time having read this book. Hegel is less abstract with this book than he is with his Phenomenology of Spirit, and he is trying to take himself more seriously with this book. When Heidegger said that ‘philosophy ended with Hegel’ and ‘by logic, Hegel meant metaphysics’ he is referr