nted delight.

Montesinos.—To this I must reply, that the fulfilment of those calamitous events predicted in the Gospels may safely be referred, as it usually is, and by the best Biblical scholars, to the destruction of Jerusalem.  Concerning the visions of the Apocalypse, sublime as they are, I speak with less hesitation, and dismiss them from my thoughts, as more congenial to the fanatics of whom you have spoken than to me.  And for the coming of Antichrist, it is no longer a received opinion in these days, whatever it may have been in yours.  Your reasoning applies to the enthusiastic millenarians who discover the number of the beast, and calculate the year when a vial is to be poured out, with as much precision as the day and hour of an eclipse.  But it leaves my hope unshaken and untouched.  I know that the world has improved; I see that it is improving; and I believe that it will continue to improve in natural and certain progress.  Good and evil principles are widely at work: a crisis is evidently approaching; it may be dreadful, but I can have no doubts concerning the result.  Black and ominous as the aspects may appear, I regard them without dismay.  The common exclamation of the poor and helpless, when they feel themselves oppressed, conveys to my mind the sum of the surest and safest philosophy.  I say with them, “God is above,” and trust Him for the event.

Sir Thomas More.—God is above—but the devil is below.  Evil principles are, in their nature, more active than good.  The harvest is precarious, and must be prepared with labour, and cost, and care; weeds spring up of themselves, and flourish and seed whatever may be the season.  Disease, vice, folly, and madness are contagious; while health and understanding are incommunicable, and wisdom and virtue hardly to be communicated!  We have come, however, to some c